Lipoprotein(a) Serum Levels Predict Pulse Wave Velocity in Subjects in Primary Prevention for Cardiovascular Disease with Large Apo(a) Isoforms: Data from the Brisighella Heart Study.

In the last decades, high serum levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) have been associated with increased cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, in particular among individuals with smaller apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms than those with larger sizes. The aim of our analysis was to evaluate whether Lp(a) levels could predict early vascular aging, and whether smaller apo(a) isoforms had a predictive value for vascular aging different than larger apo(a) isoforms in a cohort of subjects free from CVD. We considered the data of a subset of Brisighella Heart Study (BHS) participants free from CVD (462 men and 516 women) who were clinically evaluated during the 2012 BHS population survey. Predictors of arterial stiffness, measured as carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity (cfPWV) were estimated by the application of a step-wise linear regression model. In our cohort, there were 511 subjects with small apo(a) size and 467 subjects with large apo(a) isoforms. Subjects with larger apo(a) isoform sizes had significantly lower serum levels of Lp(a). In the BHS subpopulation sample, cfPWV was predicted by age, systolic blood pressure (SBP), serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), triglycerides (TG) and sex, higher HDL-C serum levels and female sex associated with lower values of cfPWV. In subjects with smaller apo(a) isoform sizes, predictors of cfPWV were age, SBP, sex and serum levels of HDL-C, being higher HDL-C serum levels and female sex associated to lower values of cfPWV. In subjects with larger apo(a) isoform sizes, cfPWV was predicted by age, SBP, serum levels of Lp(a) and sex, with female sex associated with lower values of cfPWV. In our subpopulation sample, Lp(a) did not predict cfPWV. However, in subjects with large apo(a) isoform sizes, Lp(a) was a significant predictor of arterial stiffness.

Evaluation of twelve formulas for LDL-C estimation in a large, blinded, random Italian population.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) is the major determinant of cardiovascular disease (CVD) burden. Being the direct assays time consuming, expensive, not fully standardized and not worldwide available, indirect formulas represent the most used laboratory estimation of LDL-C. In this study we analyzed the accuracy of twelve formulas for LDL-C estimation in an Italian population of 114,774 individuals. METHODS: All lipid samples were analyzed using direct homogeneous assay. The population was divided into various subgroups based on triglycerides and directly dosed LDL-C (D-LDL) levels. Twelve formulas (Friedewald, DeLong, Hata, Hattori, Puavillai, Anandaraja, Ahmadi, Chen, Vujovic, de Cordova, Martin, and Sampson) were compared in terms of their mean absolute deviations and the correlation and concordance of their estimated LDL-C with the respective D-LDL values. RESULTS: LCL-C measured by Friedewald formula and direct assay differed by more than 9 mg/dL. For D-LDL>115 mg/dl, we observed a concordance rate of only 55% between Friedewald and the respective D-LDL values. For TG<250 mg/dl, the proportion of reclassification between the different formulas and D-LDL was 14.1% with Vujovic, 14.4% Sampson, 15.9% DeLong, 16.5% Puavilai, 19.9% Martin, 21.9% Friedewald, 23.5% Chen, 29% Anandaraja, 31.1% Ahmadi, 31.5% Hata, 33.2% Hattori, and 44.4% with De Cordova formula. CONCLUSIONS: Our study compared for the first time 12 different LDL-C formulas on a Southern European population of more than 100,000 people. 'Several formulas showed better accuracy compared to Friedewald. Sampson, Martin and Vujovic resulted the most accurate formulas.

Who needs acetylsalicylic acid? Some order after many studies.

The role of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in cardiovascular prevention is essentially consequence of its ability to inhibit platelet aggregation, thus reducing the impact of atherosclerotic disease. The preventive power of this drug is clear when used in patients with previous cardiovascular event (myocardial infarction, stroke, etc.), but the data are less dependable when considering patients who did not experienced a cardiovascular event or in the diabetic population, in whom recent studies reported neutral results in term of efficacy, in face of an increase in the risk of bleeding. Furthermore, the interpretation of the efficacy results of ASA should be reconsidered in light of the increasing clinical complexity, not addressed in the clinical studies on which current evidences are based. Accordingly the rationale for ASA use in cardiovascular prevention is ever more of current interest, and requires a particular attention, considering the crucial role of antithrombotic therapy in the foreseeable future. What could be learned on the use of ASA in cardiovascular prevention after a century since its chemical synthesis? In secondary prevention, supporting evidences have now a couple of decades of history, and the use of the drug appears to be firmly established: in this setting, the benefits clearly surpass the risks. On the other hand, in primary prevention, where age and diabetes are among the main risk factors, the risk/benefit ratio for prophylactic therapy with ASA does not support its widespread use. Deciding when this treatment should be implemented should require a case-by-case evaluation, considering, first, the correction of each risk factor, whose control has led to a reduction of global cardiovascular mortality. The other fundamental aspect is the compliance to the treatment, particularly in patients subjected to multiple drugs regimens, in whom the physician should take into account the specific needs of the patient, as not to provide a mere prescription service.

Awareness of major cardiovascular risk factors and its relationship with markers of vascular aging: Data from the Brisighella Heart Study.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: General population awareness about cardiovascular risk factors is usually low. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the vascular aging of subjects aware and not aware to be hypertensive, hypercholesterolemic, hypertriglyceridemic or diabetics in a general population sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: We interviewed 1652 subjects without atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases (M: 46.6%, F: 53.4%) about their awareness of hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, hypertriglyceridemia or type 2 diabetes. Then we compared the augmentation index and pulse wave velocity of subjects aware and not aware of the investigated cardiovascular risk factors. 1049 participants declared not to be hypertensive, while 32 were not sure. Among them, respectively, 23.5% and 50% were hypertensive. Subjects not aware of their hypertension had significantly higher aortic blood pressure than aware ones (p < 0.001). 841 participants declared not to be hypercholesterolemic, while 60 were not sure. Among them, respectively, 18.1% and 40% were hypercholesterolemic. Subjects not aware of their hypercholesterolemia had significantly higher augmentation index than the aware ones (p < 0.05). 1226 participants declared not to be hypertriglyceridemic, while 200 were not sure. Among them, respectively, 19.2% and 44% were hypertriglyceridemic. Subjects not aware of their hypertriglyceridemia had significantly higher TG levels aware ones (p < 0.05), although this seemed to not related to increased arterial stiffness. 1472 participants declared not to be diabetic, while 20 were not sure. Among them, respectively, 2.0% and 25.0% were diabetics. Subjects not aware of their diabetes had significantly higher augmentation index than the aware ones (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, the lack of awareness of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia is relatively frequent in the general population and is associated to significantly higher arterial stiffness.

Current pharmacotherapeutic options for primary dyslipidemia in adults.

INTRODUCTION: Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) and its clinical manifestations, remain a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. One of the major risk factors of ASCVD is dyslipidemia and all the available guidelines suggest the importance of strategies for lipid control in a remarkable proportion of the general population. AREAS COVERED: This review focuses on the therapeutic options available for the management of lipid disorders in adults. EXPERT OPINION: A large body of evidence supports that statins are still the first-line option for the management of hypercholesterolemia in a large percentage of patients. Statins should be given at the appropriate dose and considering the differences in lipid-lowering potency across the different medications. The main current challenge in the treatment of lipid disorders is the need of improving patient adherence and persistence to lipid-lowering treatments beyond the drug choice and the target lipid component. To achieve this goal, the best strategy would be to treat the patients by using the appropriate drugs given at adequate doses to reach the treatment target. We should also avoid drug interactions, monitor possible untoward side effects and promote adherence to treatment by tailoring treatment strategies to each patient.

Optimizing Lipid Pattern by Adding a Combined Nutraceutical or Pravastatin to Fenofibrate Treatment in Hypertriglyceridemic Subjects: Single Site, Randomized, Open-Label, Post-Market Clinical Investigation.

INTRODUCTION: Fenofibrate is an effective and safe treatment for hypertriglyceridemia. However, after TG reduction a residual dyslipidemia could appear and require further treatment. AIM: To comparatively evaluate the short-term tolerability and efficacy of a combined lipid-lowering nutraceutical and pravastatin 40 mg in fenofibrate treated patients. METHOD: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients well-tolerating treatment with micronized fenofibrate 145 mg/day and with residual dyslipidemia (LDL-C > 115 mg/dL and TG > 150 mg/dL). Exclusion criteria have been type 2 diabetes, Familial Hypercholesterolemia, previous cardiovascular diseases and severe chronic kidney disease. Then, we have randomly assigned the patients to treatment with pravastatin 40 mg or a combined lipid-lowering nutraceutical (Armolipid Plus®, containing monacolin 3 mg and berberine 500 mg). RESULTS: After 8 weeks of treatment, 80% of pravastatin treated patients (N. 16/20) and 75% of those treated with Armolipid Plus® (N. 15/20) reached the desired LDL-C target, while 50% of pravastatin treated patients (N. 10/20) and 80% of the Armolipid Plus® treated ones reached the desired TG target (N. 16/20). No one adverse event has been registered during Armolipid Plus®, while 1 patient claimed myalgia and 1 reported significant increase of CPK (> 3 ULN) during pravastatin treatment. Both patients were then treated with Armolipid Plus® with resolution of symptoms and CPK increase, respectively. CONCLUSION: In hypertriglyceridemic patients treated with fenofibrate, the association with a combined lipid lowering nutraceutical seem to be more effective in optimizing residual hypertriglyceridemia than pravastatin 40 mg, while being more tolerable and having similar effect on LDL-C plasma level.